You are reviewing Topic 1 of 4 in ROI & Cost Savings

The Real Cost of Paper Filing

Return to ROI & Cost Savings
Financial & Operational Impact

The Real Cost of Paper Filing

The hidden time, supplies, storage, and delay costs of paper filing, with an illustrative example showing how a few minutes per document add up over a year.

The cost of paper filing is not just the cost of paper. It is the time spent filing, retrieving, and returning documents, the hours lost searching for what was misfiled, and the quiet expense of cabinets, toner, copies, and storage that add up over a year.

Time is the biggest hidden cost

Most offices never add up the minutes people spend handling paper. A single filing or retrieval might take only a few minutes, so it feels like nothing. But those minutes repeat all day, every day, across every employee who touches documents.

The handling figures in this article are stated per employee, per workday, and they describe individual filing or retrieval activities — not necessarily unique documents. The same physical document may be filed once and retrieved several times, and each of those activities is a separate few minutes of labor.

  • Time spent filing documents into the correct cabinet and folder
  • Time spent retrieving a document and returning it when finished
  • Time spent searching for a misplaced or incorrectly filed record
  • Delays when someone needs information held by another department or location
  • Repeated handling when the same document is requested again and again

The supplies and space you may be paying for

Paper filing also carries direct, ongoing costs that are easy to overlook:

  • Paper, toner, and printer maintenance for the copies you make
  • Filing cabinets, shelving, boxes, and the floor space they occupy
  • Off-site storage and retrieval fees for older or archival records
  • Unnecessary duplication when the same record lives in several places

Floor space is a real cost. A row of filing cabinets takes up room that could be used for revenue-producing work, and off-site storage often charges by the box plus a retrieval fee every time you need something back.

How a few minutes add up

Here is a clearly labeled illustrative example. It is not an IMS performance result. It uses a small set of assumptions to show how the minutes add up over a year.

The $25 figure used here is an editable example of a loaded hourly labor rate, not a verified national average. A loaded rate is meant to include more than take-home wages: it bundles in the employer's share of payroll taxes, benefits, insurance, paid leave, and other employment-related costs. Your own loaded rate may be lower or higher depending on role, location, and benefits, and you should use a number that reflects your actual cost of labor rather than treat $25 as a benchmark.

Illustrative assumptions

  • 5 employees handle documents
  • Each performs 20 document-handling activities per workday (filing or retrieval)
  • Each activity takes 3 minutes
  • 250 workdays per year
  • Loaded hourly labor cost: $25 (editable example, not a national average)

Annual handling activities: 25,000 (5 × 20 × 250)

Annual handling time: 1,250 hours (25,000 × 3 ÷ 60)

Annual labor value of that time: $31,250 (1,250 × $25)

When a document goes missing, the cost multiplies

The estimate above assumes every document is exactly where it should be. In real offices, that is not always true. A misfiled, mislabeled, or temporarily borrowed record can turn a routine lookup into a search that pulls in several people at once.

When one document cannot be found, the cost is rarely just one person's time. A requester asks a coworker whether they have seen it, that coworker checks another area, someone else is interrupted to ask where similar files are kept, and a supervisor may get pulled in to authorize a search through restricted records. Each interruption is a few minutes of a different person's day — and each interruption also delays the work that person was already doing. The missing document does not just cost labor; it creates delays and lost productivity that ripple through the people who were pulled away from their own tasks.

That estimate does not count the searches for documents that were not where they should have been, the delays waiting on another department, or the off-site retrieval fees. Add those in and the number grows. The point is not the exact figure, but that a few minutes per document-handling activity, repeated all year, becomes a meaningful amount of labor.

What this estimate does and does not mean
The number above estimates the value of employee time spent handling paper. It is not a promise that IMS will eliminate that time, nor that every recovered hour becomes cash savings. Some paper may still be needed, and recovered time is often redirected to other work rather than removed from payroll. See Understanding Document Management ROI for why time saved is not always money saved.

You do not have to go completely paperless

Document management does not require every business to eliminate paper. Many organizations keep the original paper records where they remain useful and add electronic copies to a document management system for faster searching, viewing, and sharing. The goal is to reduce the everyday handling and searching that consume the most time, not to force a change that does not fit how your office works.

Ready to see what this might look like for your office? Try the Quick Savings Calculator with your own numbers, or Detailed ROI Assessment for a fuller picture.

A Look Back — Or Maybe Not So Far Back

This short video was produced some years ago to illustrate the everyday costs of paper filing. The statistics it references reflect the office environment of that time and are included here as historical context, not as current industry benchmarks. Any mention of a 30% reduction in printing is an illustrative figure from the video, not a guaranteed IMS result. Still, if your organization relies heavily on paper files, filing cabinets, and manual retrieval, you may recognize how familiar these challenges still feel today.

Historical video — statistics and any reduction figures are illustrative, reflect the era of production, and are not current research or guaranteed IMS results.